54: ), there is normally no doubt that non-state parties to armed conflict are bound by IHL applicable to non-international armed conflict. While “it is a matter of controversy whether human rights law also binds non‑State actors” (see here at p. Serious violations of IHL – war crimes – in non-international armed conflicts are investigated at the domestic and international level, and individuals alleged to be responsible for such violations are prosecuted and tried. ![]() Violations of IHL during non-international armed conflicts are widely deplored and condemned. This realization is striking when thinking of the present firm acceptance of IHL governing non-international armed conflicts: In various international fora, there are regular calls on parties to non-international armed conflicts to act in accordance with their obligations under IHL, for example. Pressure – International Humanitarian Law and Internal Armed Conflict” providesĪ stark reminder that, historically, this understanding was far from a given. Giovanni Mantilla’s book “Lawmaking under Regulation of non-international armed conflicts by international humanitarian The 1949 Geneva Conventions and 1977 Additional Protocols. She continues to work for the ICRC in a legal capacity.] Previously, she was a legal adviser on the update of the ICRC commentaries on ![]() The time of conceptualizing this post, Iris Mueller was a thematic legalĪdviser in the ICRC legal division, working mostly on customary IHL.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |